Leadership – How does it impact management?
Leadership has a direct relationship with an organisation in terms of its ability to create change. This change can be seen in terms of cultural tolerance, determining the value placed on employees, and their motivation. Leaders also play a role in shaping strategies to ensure effectiveness and execution. If viewed from the perspective of leadership, there is a need to understand the exchange of power and how secure outcomes can be achieved. Understanding different ropes well can increase the vocabulary used to discuss this important topic, which will ultimately lead to desired results. Bearing this in mind, leaders could also create quality as an enormously wearing incident for organisations. Transformation on the basis of leadership offers systematic and intensive review which enriches the research opportunities and advances knowledge. ..
Democracies are founded on the idea that people have a right to express themselves and have their say. When a leader is autocratic, they trust their own judgement more than the opinion of their followers. This can damage an organisation if the leader is not able to listen to their followers and execute a strategy that is best for the organisation. This theory could be used to understand how autocratic leaders might execute a strategy that does not benefit their followers.
Democratic leadership theory sounds good on paper, but it can lead to problems when implemented. Leaders who follow the theory often put in a lot of effort to build consensus, but this can be difficult when it comes to making decisions that are important to the group. Democratic leadership theory often leads to frustration because people feel like they are at an equal disadvantage when it comes to trying to make decisions. This can lead to problems because people may not be able to come up with a consensus on important issues.
Theory explanation
This leadership theory of autocratic style came up in formal studies when Kurt Lewin in his article “American journal and society” wrote about it, in the 1930s. This autocratic leadership is also known as autocratic and leadership that mainly characterise individual control over a decision and a very little input as a group member. Autocratic leaders are typically known for their toys making based judgement and ideas which really acknowledge advice from followers. While exercising this kind of leadership style sometimes becomes a mostly useful and dependent factor for a situation where the task group is not working accordingly but the primary character leaves the group to feel like they are being trusted or provided less importance to. Also This triggers the tendency of building a rigid environment discouraging creativity and establishing trends and rules which clearly outline communication. ..
Democratic theory of leadership is a theory that suggests that leaders play a crucial role in the democratic movement. It is based on the idea that humans are social animals and that, as such, leaders play a key role in the democratic process. Democratic leadership is said to involve participants in decision making so that they can have an accurate understanding of what is happening around them. Leaders are also said to be trusted and confident in their employees, and encourage them to get involved in the decision-making process.
Theory Application
In the IT sector, it is necessary to have a centralized control over the working environment in order to meet deadlines and keep the precision of walk maintained. Leaders responsible for providing details and instruction are given responsibility for making decisions so that the precision of walk is being maintained.
This type of leadership is considered as shared leadership in this type of situation, where every member of the group takes a participative role in the decision-making process. Leaders need to exert moral values in order to lead the team towards a successful outcome. Because in IT organisations, there are groups that perform tasks that encourage creativity and innovation, democratic leadership could lead to more creative and better ideas being brought to fruition. Every member of the team feels committed to the project, which could result in better results at the end.
Critical Evaluation
Some time autocratic leadership can be beneficial, but there are also instances where this leadership style creates problems. People get abusive under an autocratic leadership style because it is often controlled by the group members of the employees that the leader becomes bossy, dictatorial and controlling. This resulted in resentment in the group. Also, Batool et al. (2017) mentioned group members might end up feeling like they have no importance for input in performing the task which particularly creates problems when capable members are not given proper parity within the team to contribute their knowledge that might result in failure of a project under an autocratic leadership. Kars and Inandi (2018) have argued that if autocratic behavior is being exerted within an organisation then the leader have to think observe the situation in a sympathetic way so that it’s become easy to work with the members and bring out their full potential as exerting an autocratic leadership is important for having updated side in terms of management but giving value to the team members and making them feel worthy. ..
Democratic leadership style has some potential downsides. In situations where the role becomes unclear or the time is less democratic leadership might lead to incomplete projector communication failure. NAGENDRA and FAROOQUI (2016) also said in some situations group members might be having necessary expertise or knowledge to make quality contributions in terms of decision making. Democratic leadership code results in team members feeling to be less important and their Idea or opinion not getting in count which in some situations main lowdown employee morale and satisfaction. As debited by Haider et al. (2015), if you want to exert democratic leadership style you must understand the situation and timeliness to allow the group members to provide their opinion. As it is very necessary to have an organised structure so to maintain subgroups it is sometimes required to perform strictly and show one of the ideas provided by the group as the one to be performed on.
This systematic review of the Framework offers a promising environment for a field to work in, both democratic and autocratic leadership might be beneficial for an organisation working in the IT sector if the contribution of this approach gets with proper macro and micro strategic alignment.
